Redaxscript - Community - Ultra lightweight website engine

Community

Facebook group

Our facebook group is the right place for questions, remarks or suggestions: http://facebook.com/groups/redaxscript

Henry Ruhs, how about translation page for RX? Like web page where one can translate RX to some sort of language. User registers as translator and gets access to page like that. It would be easy'er to maintain translations this way.

1 Comment

Henry Ruhs

Good idea, I will try this with the next translator...

Henry Ruhs

Jörg Steinhauer designed the new admin template elements: http://www.joerg-st.net/public/redaxscript-cokanh.png http://www.joerg-st.net/public/redaxscript-cokanh2.png http://www.joerg-st.net/public/redaxscript-cokanh3.png In 0.4 the admin (backend) of Redaxscript is using elements from the default template. The problem while creating a template from scratch is a broken admin cause of missing definition for accordion, buttons, inputs, table and tabmenü. So for release 1.0, we decided to put those elements to the admin template.

1 Comment

Hakim Zulkufli

Splendid!

Ewerton Soares

Hey Henry, some time ago I sent to you some translations to Portuguese of some modules, did you received it?

3 Comments

Henry Ruhs

No I did not. Be so kind and send it to: info@redaxmedia.com Thanks

Ewerton Soares

Done :)

Henry Ruhs

http://code.google.com/p/redaxscript/source/detail?r=1266 I updated the 0.4.1 branch with your new files. Some changes did not pass, including the core pt.php because I prefer exact (word for word) translation. The file manager's pt.php was equal to en.php :-)

Matīss Roberts Treinis

I rewrote Redaxscript article at Wikipedia today according to they'r TOS. Please, do not ruin this addition by adding stupid ass advertisement-like stuff to that page. If you do not know what are You doing - do not touch that article at all. Additional information and contribution by independent authors who are capable of writing content with sense of objectiveness (not You Henry Ruhs) is welcome.

8 Comments

Henry Ruhs

this is great, but even the official draft was not accepted... what can we do now? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Redaxscript "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."

Matīss Roberts Treinis

Of course it didn't get accepted. There is reliable sources FYI you wrote there. Every single bit of info must have link. You have a lot of info there but no sources. I have less info but with references where needed. I think there is no reason someone would not accept my article.

Matīss Roberts Treinis

What i mean is we should have a small starting point with basic info only. Then You should add a small bits of info there so article would not be deleted entirely in case of shitstorm from mods.

Henry Ruhs

okay, lets see what happens. what should I do with the draft submission?

Matīss Roberts Treinis

Save it for later or kill it.

Matīss Roberts Treinis

Oh and Henry Ruhs, how did you enjoy yesterday's hockey game? (trollface)

Henry Ruhs

What? I usually do not follow sport events...

Henry Ruhs

Can you add an logo too? See: http://redaxscript.com/files/press_kits/logos.zip

Henry Ruhs

Basic function reference finished: http://redaxscript.com/develop/documentation/function-reference

1 Comment

Janne Urpo Mikael Peltoperä

Yeah yeah ;-)

Henry Ruhs

Another try to get Redaxscript on Wikipedia... do not copy/paste text from the website - this is now allowed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_wizard/Ready_for_submission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redaxscript PS: I cannot start a Redaxscript article, that would be advertising... Help me :-)

4 Comments

Petre Alexandru Popescu

This is not "advertising"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VBulletin

Krzysztof Staniorowski

well, if you'll only remind me I can write articles at least for english and polish editions of Wikipedia :)

Henry Ruhs

Adding a draft... please add some text http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Redaxscript

Henry Ruhs

Round 2 .. made another review request after adding cite and footnotes

Henry Ruhs

Softaculous contacted me today: "Is it possible for you to change the version of your script to 1.x? We will be adding it once this is done as this will state that the product is stable" So 0.4.1 will be known under 1.0 - see the new roadmap http://redaxscript.com/develop/roadmap Maby it was my fault to have a 0.x version convention, because Redaxscript was stable since 0.3.0 ... my idea was that 1.0 equals the perfect CMS :-)

4 Comments

Hakim Zulkufli

Well, 0.4 is stable enough and consider the 1.0 as the initial stable release.

Henry Ruhs

thank you hakim :-)

Janne Urpo Mikael Peltoperä

PERFECT? Ok, I will give you that you made something awesome but it is not close to perfect, you have way to many ideas and always hunting for more. Even if you'ld kept the original version numbers it would not be perfect til 1.0, maybe 1.2 though. Just kidding with you. Redaxscript is actually top notch and way better then I could manage. I will follow your progress. Rock on Henry Ruhs.